Ten years ago, on March 8, 2013, David Bowie released his next-to-last studio album, his first in 10 years. Bowie had always been an artist beloved of critics because he spoke their language, and flattered them. He was (apparently; I never spoke to him) a great interview subject — he knew a lot about art and pop, and could combine the two in beguiling ways. But to beguile means to deceive, and the illusion often faded quickly. Bowie knew this, and would frequently disavow previous work when selling the new stuff. On The Next Day, though, he made the links to his past explicit, almost as if he needed to remind people who he was (or had once been). The cover was literally the cover of 1977’s “Heroes”, with that title crossed out and a white square with the new album’s title slapped across it.
(Personally, I think Phil Collins pulled a much better version of this trick when he reissued his albums Face Value, No Jacket Required, and …But Seriously in 2016 or so, with new cover art that duplicated the originals, but now featured the old-man version of himself. A shot of old-man Bowie re-creating the “Heroes” pose would have been cooler than this.)
Some of the lyrics on The Next Day were about Berlin, too, and/or about subjects he had tackled in the old days, which allowed reviewers to flex their knowledge of his late ’70s albums (admittedly, his best work). And naturally, some writers took the bait. Rolling Stone called it “a triumphant album…the comeback Bowie fans feared would never happen” while explicitly citing Low, “Heroes”, Lodger, and Scary Monsters. The Guardian, meanwhile, did a deep dive into the lyrics and the sounds, attempting to spot as many references and bits of arcana as possible, like one of those conspiracy theorists’ yarn-and-Post-It-note charts that take over entire rooms, but ultimately came to the conclusion that “for all the pointers it offers in that direction, The Next Day isn’t the equal of Bowie’s ’70s work.”
Anyway, when I reviewed the album for BA, I decided not to play Bowie’s game. Instead, I chose to focus my attention on the thing I figured most other reviewers were likely to ignore in favor of lyric-parsing and personality profiles disguised as music criticism. I wrote about how the record actually sounded, and what the backing musicians contributed. So below, you will find a David Bowie album review with almost no mention of David Bowie. Enjoy!
The new David Bowie album, The Next Day, demonstrates and showcases the virtues of, and reasserts the radicalism of, seemingly traditional rock music. Were the vocals mixed just a little lower, the band’s contributions could be heard that much more clearly, and recognized that much more easily, but the conscientious listener—headphones are recommended—will soon take note of the small, almost tossed-off moments of sonic surprise and subtle brilliance, conjured via the minds and hands of genuine virtuosi, that are the true heart of this record.
The Next Day features a medium-sized cast of musicians, but there’s a core group who perform on most of the tracks. Gerry Leonard is the primary guitarist, playing on 13 of 14 tracks; Gail Ann Dorsey is the bassist on seven songs (she also sings background vocals at times), while Tony Levin handles five others; and drummer Zachary Alford is heard on 12 of 14 songs. David Torn also plays guitar on seven pieces here, while Earl Slick guests on three. Two songs, “Valentine’s Day” and “(You Will) Set the World on Fire,” have sharply divergent personnel from the rest of the record—Slick on guitar, Tony Visconti (the album’s producer) on bass, and Sterling Campbell on drums. (Leonard also plays guitar on “(You Will) Set the World on Fire.”) And on three songs, Steve Elson plays baritone sax and/or contrabass clarinet, while pianist Henry Hey appears on two others. A four-piece string section (Antoine Silverman, Maxim Moston, Hiroko Taguchi, and Anja Wood) play on four songs.
The songs with Elson are some of the most immediately interesting. “Dirty Boys” is built on a lurching groove reminiscent of Tom Waits songs like “The Earth Died Screaming” or “Way Down in the Hole.” Alongside the farting horn, the three guitars—straight chopping chords from Leonard and Visconti, and sandpapery blues noises from Earl Slick (I’m assuming)—sear the air. Levin and Alford are a precise rhythm team who nevertheless know how to let the groove breathe. Elson is the only player who gets a real solo, but the song fades as he’s heading into an exciting, almost Archie Shepp-ish place.
He doesn’t get to do even that much on the next song, “The Stars (Are Out Tonight),” mostly growling in the background as strings that feel like an indulgence (the parts played by four live humans could easily have been punched in from a keyboard; just ask Dimmu Borgir) swoop and swoon. For much of his third appearance, on “Boss of Me,” he shadows the bassist, inserting ultra-low rumbles at the edge of the mix. But as the song progresses, he gradually rises in the mix, and in the final minute or so of the piece, he enters into a call-and-response with the vocalist, and is finally (along with the keyboards) the last sound heard, a long-held note slowly dissolving.
For the most part, the songs on The Next Day are built on supple if conventional rock grooves. In the hands of lesser players, these might be forgettable, even ignorable, a mere backdrop. But a truly exemplary rock performance is as difficult a feat of instrumental interaction as anything in contemporary music—compare, say, prime AC/DC, on its face as primitive and simplistic as rock music gets, to the work of an AC/DC imitator like Rhino Bucket, and you’ll understand what I mean. For this reason, the best music here is made when the band is operating more or less as a unit, relatively free from outside interference.
A perfect counterexample is “Love is Lost,” which features a one-finger keyboard contribution from the singer that’s somewhere between ? and the Mysterians’ “96 Tears” and Miles Davis’s “Rated X,” and which is instantly less interesting than its immediate predecessor, “The Stars (Are Out Tonight)”; the rhythm is stiff and mechanistic, the drums mixed to sound like a crudely programmed track from the ’80s and the bass hitting one note, over and over and over. Compare that with the shuffling groove and gently psychedelic guitar spirals of “I’d Rather Be High,” also played by Leonard and Alford. (“Love is Lost” features Dorsey on bass, while “I’d Rather Be High” has Levin.) The one-finger keyboards return on “How Does the Grass Grow?”, but they’re beaten back by some digitally crisped guitar from David Torn, the latest in a string of art-noise guitarists to be heard on David Bowie albums, including Robert Fripp and Reeves Gabrels.
Torn, who’s worked extensively with saxophonist Tim Berne, among many, many others, is one of the best things about The Next Day. His contributions are sometimes subtle, sometimes noisy and abrasive, but always welcome. His ability to balance distortion and a beautifully vaporous sort of sound, one that’s uniquely his as far as I can tell, makes him the kind of musician that can vault a seemingly traditional rock song into new, unexpected territory. His embrace of technology also makes him a bridge between classicism and futurism, allowing for a slickness that never feels trendy or bound to the moment of a song’s recording. As a result of his efforts, and those of his bandmates, this is a record which reveals more and more to the focused ear over time. We think we know everything that guitar, bass and drums can accomplish, and that seemingly conventional and familiar structures are an excuse to let our attention wane, to spend more time thinking about lyrics, or fashion, or a record’s position within the commercial landscape, than the actual sounds being produced by the musicians involved. The Next Day is a blow against that mentality, and as such deserves close attention.
Want to read an excerpt from Chapter Six of my upcoming book In the Brewing Luminous: The Life and Music of Cecil Taylor? Join my Patreon. (You can also read excerpts from the first five chapters.)
That’s it for now. See you next week!
Your idea for an alternate TND cover would have been such an improvement!
This album was such a welcome comeback at the time, and while critics seemed to downgrade it once Blackstar came around (after giving it the usual "best since Scary Monsters!" praise at the time), I think it holds up well. Like almost all DB albums post-Tin Machine, it would have benefited by relegating a few of the weaker songs to b-sides or the follow-up EXTRA release, but it's filled with some great writing and performances. That cover, though...